|
The Privacy Act: A hindrance to social service synergy?
Liam Butler - 20/01/06
Social service agencies find that New Zealand's Privacy Act creates as many
problems as benefits for their clients. In 1961 Joseph Heller's famous book
titled 'Catch-22' was published. In it Heller wrote of a Catch-22 rule that
was misused to further oppress individuals that it was designed to protect.
In 2002 New Zealand's Privacy Commissioner described the Privacy Act as
'not a technical rule-book offering an immediate steer in a specific fact
situation. Rather, it sets down clear concepts and encourages good handling
practice. The principles in the Act are in fact quite general'. It is this
generality which continues to be a source of consternation for social
service agencies. On the one hand agencies want to protect their client's
personal information, but on the other hand they want to use it in a manner
that maximizes its potential to assist that client.
On occasions such as service provider forums, working groups and
conferences the Privacy Act constantly adds an awkward aspect to
proceedings. To what extent, if any, should an individual's personal
information be shared in a forum? What about at the governance level of
such social service providers? Should executive members of a social service
agency be privy to personal information regarding the clients of the agency
they govern? Under the Privacy Act confusion exists as to what extent
stakeholders are entitled to view client's personal information. This
inhibits the synergy that can be created from a collaborative approach to
social service issues.
To counter the generality of the Privacy Act the Privacy Commissioner has
suggested that more direct guidance applicable to industries can be
legislated for in industry codes.While not wanting to endorse yet more
legislation for the social service sector, clients of social service
agencies will continue to lose out when agencies, under the guise of
protecting clients' rights under the Privacy Act, do not share with their
own governance team or other agencies information that could enhance the
effectiveness of the service they offer. A Catch 22 indeed.
Editor's comment
Many readers in different organisations and different countries must have
experienced problems with privacy issues.
Please join NZine,
which will give you the chance to comment in the forum at the end of this article.
What has been your experience with privacy issues?
|
Forum
Participate or View Thread
|